I'm thrilled and honored to be the host today for Patti Digh's Blog Tour '08 for her fabulous new book, Life Is a Verb - How to Wake Up, Be Mindful and Live Intentionally. The tour kicked off last week and I encourage you to check Patti's blog for links to the Blog Tour stops. And be sure and check Patti's bookstore tour schedule which kicks off tomorrow in Seattle--you might be lucky enough to have her coming to your town! Want to invite Patti to your town to speak to your group...or be interviewed on your radio show or podcast...or maybe have her speak to your next blackberry picking party?! ;) More info here.
This is a book chock-full of essays that will remind you of who you are. Each essay is followed not just by Action items, but also Movement steps. Because, really, isn't it all about moving forward? And in an extraordinary move, Patti illustrated her book with artwork created by readers of her blog, 37 Days. It's a truly gorgeous book. You'll see what I mean once you've held a copy in your hands.
Since the U.S. has been immersed in a--at times very divisive--Presidential election for nearly two years, I asked Patti if she would be willing to answer a few interview questions about how we could apply some of the Life Is a Verb principles as a nation. Patti joked on Twitter last week that she planned to run for President in 2012 (hey, maybe she wasn't joking!) and began wondering who might be in her cabinet. I suggested that it would be wonderful if she created a Dept. of Inclusion. I hereby nominate Patti for that position in the next administration. If anyone could help us with a national conversation to bridge our differences, I have no doubt that Patti is that person.
Here then is my interview with her...
* There's a wonderful poem by Marybeth Fidler
called "The Bumble Bee" on page 138...an excerpt...
i see where i want to go
and in my panic
i forget to look for the
open window
In your work, what's one
area where you see people of all stripes forgetting to look for the open
window?
I
really love that poem. I heard Marybeth read it at a leadership retreat over a
decade ago and the image was so strong that it has stayed with me ever since. I
knew I wanted to ask her permission to use it in the book the moment I started
writing.
I
know there are times when we make life more difficult than it need be. I do
that on an almost daily basis. But I’ll answer your question from a slightly
different perspective:
I
think, actually, that sometimes we don’t forget to look for the open window at
all. I think we sometimes know it’s there, and we ignore it.
Because
sometimes hitting frenetically against the glass is more valued than the ease
with which a bee can go through an open window. If people are watching, hitting
that glass is more impressive, isn’t it? Sometimes, in fact, I believe we get
an exaggerated sense of self importance by articulating repeatedly a litany of
just how many panes of glass we are hitting against – and how hard. And for how
long.
Our
frenetic workplaces, particularly in this country, are—in large part—an
expression of our need to be important. As if being alive weren’t important enough.
Marybeth
used to say to me, “do less, be more,” and I can fully see the wisdom of that
phrase now. What if I don’t need to be indispensable at work—what then? Where
would I get my sense of importance then? These seem like Big Questions we
should be asking ourselves from time to time. Perhaps the next time we see a
bee, we should all stop and ponder those questions, and particularly the
question about our own self-importance.
* In your "Let It
Be A Barn" essay, you remind us that, "Your reality is different from
mine." If you were brought into a
roomful of Republican and Democratic strategists, what's the first exercise
you'd give them to start bridging the differences in their perceptions?
I
would love the opportunity—just in case any Republican and Democratic
strategists happen to be reading this.
There
are many concepts I’d ask them to ponder—the first of which is to recalibrate
politics as an infinite rather than a finite game. That is, as a game to learn,
and not a game to win.
I
would ask them to consider something that every young actor knows—that it is
impossible to play two intentions on stage at the same time. They each need to
name their primary intention. Is it to win, or is it to learn and in learning,
help our country learn?
I
would ask them to consider the dangers of simplifying the identity of the
“Other’ to a single point. I would offer them the understanding that
“angel/devil” dualisms always restrict movement and wisdom. Dualisms are always reductive, not generative.
I
would ask them to remain locked in a room together until they could—from the
very basis of their shared humanity—answer a single question: “On what one
thing could we NEVER agree?” Seems simple, but it’s not. Not if the cameras are
turned off. The chances are—if they did that as humans, not politicians—they
would find that there is nothing on which, at some core level, they couldn’t
agree.
We
must seek and share our common humanity, but that’s not what elections foster.
Rather, they focus on demonizing the other. A finite game, a reductive one.
* "Squeeze in Next
to Someone, Arm-to-Arm" is one of my favorite essays in the book. In what ways do you see Americans
misunderstanding others' helpfulness?
I
love that story, too.
Ours
is such a litigious society, isn’t it? Even the person who tries to save a life
faces being sued. So very different from this tale from India. We are lost to
the simple kindnesses.
I
believe it might be because we are always judging other people’s outsides from
our insides. Seeing rationale and meaning from our own perspective and not
asking for the perspective of the other. At least, that’s part of it.
Perhaps
we are too busy to help, too busy to be fully human anymore. Perhaps we resist
the intrusion of strangers, feeling that their helpfulness implies a judgment
of some sort. Perhaps we believe that others more qualified will step in.
Perhaps we’ve lost the ability to have honest human dialogue that would allow
us to ask, “May I help?” and to answer either “yes” or “no.”
Perhaps
we don’t believe that we are actually in service to every other human being,
but I believe that we are.
We
are insular in this country and to a large, sad degree, we’ve lost the simple,
human ability to “hand one another along,” as novelist and essayist Walker
Percy suggests we must. I wonder what it would take to do that each day, just a
little.
* If you could leave one of your essays in the
Oval Office to be read by the next President on Inauguration Day, which one
would it be? And why?
Oh,
my. Can I be there to read it to him or her in my best Billy Collins voice?
(Smile) Speaking of which, please tell those strategists to get dear sweet
Billy to pen a poem for Inauguration Day.
I
believe I would have to pick an essay that describes what we must do in the
spaces in between people, cultures, countries. I think it might be a simple
tale like “Save face for someone else,” since Americans are not particularly
good at the kind of cultural humility it takes to do that—it is a skill and a
way of being in the world that I believe will be increasingly important for all
of us, and particularly Americans, in the coming years.
Saving
face means helping others retain their dignity—and that’s hard to do without
more respect than our nation has shown for others we deem less human.
As George Santayana said, “Our dignity is not in
what we do, but in what we understand.” We have much to learn from the rest of
the world about what they understand.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And a final note from Patti: I’d
like to close with a personal/public note to Marilyn who has been such an
incredible support to me from the very beginning of 37days, the blog from which
this book emerged. A small, rare set of readers started reading my long
essays—far too long for blog posts!—in 2005, giving me such encouragement. My
thanks, Marilyn, for being one of those few, though we have never met. I am
privileged to know you, and to include two amazing poems of yours in Life is a
Verb.

Recent Comments